Your CFO just approved $400K for AI agents. Whether that investment pays off was decided three years ago when someone chose how to move data across your company.
The data infrastructure built for reporting breaks down when agents coordinate decisions autonomously. Batch pipelines, centralized teams, flexible schemas, redundant engineering, and fixed capacity all worked fine for scheduled analytics. They fail when agents need real-time coordination across Finance, Sales, and Operations to make purchasing decisions.
This edition examines five data infrastructure choices that separate organizations achieving 10x returns from those struggling to prove any value from identical AI spending.
1. Real-time data vs. batch processing
How most data pipelines work today
Your data pipelines were built assuming someone would run reports on yesterday’s numbers. Batch processing aggregates data overnight or every few hours, loading it into warehouses where analysts query historical trends.
Why autonomous agents break this
Agents make decisions based on the current context, but batch systems introduce hours of delay between the event and the analysis.
Your fraud detection agent receives transaction data from last night’s batch run and flags suspicious activity hours after the payment clears the banking system.
Your inventory agent processes yesterday’s sales file and reorders stock this morning, but the customer who wanted that item at midnight already bought elsewhere.
Your pricing agent adjusts rates at noon using yesterday’s demand data, missing the morning traffic surge when you could have charged more.
The performance gap
Real-time fraud systems catch 87-94% of fraudulent transactions compared to 65-70% for batch-based systems.
Klarna’s customer service agent cut resolution time from 11 minutes to 2 minutes by processing events as they occurred, replacing work equivalent to 700 full-time employees.
When to make the switch
Event-driven becomes ROI-positive at 3-5 production agents requiring responses within minutes.
Implement parallel event streaming for fraud detection, dynamic pricing, and inventory optimization while maintaining batch processing for historical analytics.
Stay updated with Simform’s weekly insights.
2. Centralized data platform vs. federated data mesh
How most data platforms work today
A centralized data team manages your warehouse, building pipelines that extract data from source systems, transform it to standard schemas, and serve it through approved interfaces.
Every new AI agent deployment requires the central team to build a pipeline, test integrations, and coordinate releases. It works when deploying 3-5 agents within a single department.
Why do AI agents change the requirements
When deployments span departments, all work waits on the central team. Finance wants revenue forecasting agents, Sales needs lead scoring agents, Operations requires inventory optimization agents, each needing different data with unique governance.
Each deployment takes 10-24 weeks as requests queue behind the central team’s roadmap. 20 agents across 5 business units would require 4-9 years, since work happens serially.
What the alternatives deliver
A federated data mesh distributes ownership to domain teams that build reusable data products. GoDaddy decentralized ownership of petabyte-scale data across domains using a data-mesh approach while modernizing its Spark platform.
Together, these changes delivered over 60% in cost reduction and roughly 50% in performance improvement for Spark workloads.
When to make the switch
Data mesh becomes ROI-positive at 10-15 agent deployments across business units.
For mid-market companies, start with centralized governance but federated domain ownership of data products. This captures velocity benefits while maintaining control for teams without dedicated platform engineering.
3. Schema enforcement through data contracts
How most data platforms work today
Your data teams ingest data from various sources without strict validation at the point of entry. Schema definitions stay flexible to accommodate different data formats, and quality checks happen during analysis or when dashboards break.
Why do AI agents change the requirements
When fields change format or go missing without warning, agents downstream make decisions based on corrupted inputs without realizing anything is wrong.
Your customer churn agent misinterprets missing data as “no activity” and flags active customers for retention campaigns.
Your pricing agent receives null values, which default to outdated rates. Each percentage-point increase in schema drift results in a 27% increase in production incidents.
What the alternatives deliver
Teams that allow schema changes to propagate without contracts consistently report low AI task reliability, with many agent workflows failing or producing partial results.
In contrast, organizations that enforce data contracts and schema validation see materially higher agent completion and predictability levels typically required before systems are trusted in production.
FinTrust Bank reduced data error rates from roughly 5% to 0.25% by enforcing schema validation at ingestion, sharply reducing downstream failures and regulatory exposure.
When to make the switch
Start with your top 5 most painful data failures from last quarter. Prioritize revenue-impacting data first, then operational dashboards.
The cost of fixing quality issues at the dashboard level runs 100 times higher than catching them at ingestion.
4. Data products vs. use-case-specific pipelines
How most data platforms work today
Teams build dedicated pipelines for each agent deployment, extracting data directly from source systems and transforming it into the format that the specific agent needs.
The first few agents deploy quickly because each team works independently, without the overhead of coordination.
Why do agents change the requirements
By the fifth agent deployment, teams discover they’re building redundant pipelines that extract overlapping data with slight variations.
Your customer churn, revenue forecasting, and fraud detection agents all need transaction history, but each team has built separate pipelines with different transformation logic.
67% of highly centralized enterprises devote over 80% of their data engineering resources to pipeline maintenance, leaving little capacity for new AI work.
What the alternatives deliver
Data products are reusable data sets designed to serve multiple agents. One EdTech firm unified data from 50 systems, reducing operational costs by 70% and accelerating processing from hours to minutes.
When to make the switch
Data products pay back when three or more agents consume similar data. Five agents using separate pipelines cost $175,000-$325,000 to build, plus $50,000-$75,000 annual maintenance.
A shared data product costs $75,000-$125,000 initially plus $15,000-$25,000 annually, delivering $100,000-$200,000 in first-year savings.
The biggest infrastructure gains come from deliberately making these choices. One decision that compounds across all five: compute-storage separation.
Traditional clusters sized for peak load force you to pay around the clock. Serverless architectures flex with actual agent demand, delivering 40-50% cost reductions at scale.
Getting these choices right requires mapping your current state against what autonomous agents actually need. We’ll walk you through it.
