Platform engineering has crossed into the mainstream: most orgs have implemented or plan to implement IDPs, and platform practices are now near‑universal in surveys.
When right‑sized, teams see faster delivery (often 30–40%) and earlier payback (6 months).
The trap is over‑engineering: “thick” platforms and rigid mandates stall adoption. Your goal is a thin, optional platform that makes the right way the easy way.
In this edition, I will walk you through when to invest, how much freedom to grant, and what to measure so you can see value quickly.
Are you at the platform inflection point?
Signals you’re ready
- Team size & complexity. Once you have 30–75 engineers across multiple teams/products, coordination overhead and inconsistent setups start to bite. This is the common break‑point for adding a platform layer.
- Slipping deploy cadence. Releases that should take minutes now take hours/days due to manual gates; you need self‑service deploys, tests, and flags to recover flow.
- Tool sprawl. Each team runs its own CI/CD scripts and cloud setup, duplicating work and risk, offering golden paths most teams choose by default.
- Onboarding drag & visible business impact. If delays and coordination tax show up as missed deadlines or rising costs, you’re there.
Example: A large insurance company used a Backstage‑fronted platform to streamline delivery and shared infra; leadership viewed it as a path to cut workforce and cloud expenses by 30% through standardization.
What can you do?
Capture lead time, deploy frequency, developer satisfaction, plus a simple map of CI/CD and environment steps to pinpoint the top bottleneck.
Stay updated with Simform’s weekly insights.
Keep autonomy while you standardize
If the signals mentioned above are flashing, your next move is to standardize the common paths without relinquishing control.
Make the right way the easy way. Stand up a Backstage portal with opinionated templates, sensible defaults, and copy‑paste docs. The platform is optional: teams can opt out with a stated reason, an accountable owner, and a plan to meet security/SRE expectations another way. Your role is to remove setup toil, not dictate design.
Avoid the anti‑patterns. Do not force one template on every workload. If a team needs something different, make the exception path explicit and fast. Instead, publish an exceptions path with a 24–48h response target and a checklist for what “secure and observable” still means.
What can you do?
Ship one golden path for a money‑path service this sprint. Publish opt‑out criteria and response SLAs. Track three signals weekly: teams onboarded, template reuse, and time to first deploy.
What to build first (the first 6–8 weeks)
Start thin and prove value on one bottleneck. Your v1 should do four things well: self‑service test environments, standardized CI/CD, a couple of reusable service templates, and a developer portal like Backstage to front it with docs and one‑click workflows. Keep it optional so teams adopt it because it’s faster, not because it’s mandated.
What this looks like in practice.
A mid‑size SaaS firm launched an IDP with Backstage‑style golden paths, automated test gates, and feature‑flag rollouts. Within weeks, they went from 2 releases/month to continuous deployment, cutting lead time by over 60% and adoption skyrocketed because the “right way” was faster.
What can you do?
- Week 1–2: Baseline deploy frequency, lead time, and time‑to‑first‑deploy for one revenue‑critical service.
- Week 3–4: Ship a golden‑path CI/CD template and self‑service test env in Backstage; measure usage.
- Week 5–6: Automate test gates and feature flags; track template reuse and error rates.
- Week 7–8 (Decision Gate): Review metrics if deploys are richer and errors/lead time are down, broaden to another team; if not, pause and refine scope.
How to build an ROI case every leader trusts
Where does payback come from?
Platform pilots unlock three key levers: faster delivery, reduced toil, and cloud waste elimination. When combined, mid‑market teams typically see payback in 6–12 months.
Levers & metrics:
- Faster delivery: Track DORA lead time and deploy frequency. Each 25% cut in lead time can translate to a 10–15% boost in feature output.
- Reduced toil: Automating CI/CD and environment setup reclaims 6–15 hours per developer per week, avoiding equivalent headcount costs.
- Cloud waste savings: Scheduled non‑prod shutdowns often recoup 50–70% of that spend; rightsized defaults add 7–10% TCO reduction.
Example
Entur (public transit): After platform standardization, they improved deployments from 2/week to 14/day, cut non‑prod compute by 60%, and redirected the savings to fund their expanded platform team, achieving ROI in under nine months.
What to report monthly:
- Lead time & deploy frequency trend for pilot teams
- % non‑prod hours shut down and cost per service
- Developer satisfaction (survey net‑promoter score)
These metrics map directly to faster releases, lower headcount pressure, and visible cost reductions, making the CFO’s line‑item case airtight.
You’ve mapped your signals, paved a golden path, proven value, and lined up CFO‑friendly metrics. Now tie it all together in these three steps:
- Launch your pilot wrap‑up. In Week 8, present your DORA gains, non‑prod savings, and developer NPS to stakeholders. Show 6–12‑month ROI and the case for expanding scope.
- Expand by proof. Add a second golden path for another critical service, and use the same metrics to track performance before and after rollout.
- Fund the platform sustainably. Redirect 50–70% of non‑prod shutdown savings and reclaimed developer hours into your platform team’s budget.
Keep the platform optional, metric‑driven, and focused on removing toil. That discipline turns a pilot into a scalable, high‑impact platform without the bloat.
