React Native vs Swift – A Side-by-Side Comparison for iOS Application Development
Are you thinking of building a cross-platform app or a native iOS app for your business requirement? How do you choose the right technology that will lend your app a unique interface? We got it covered!
This blog compares Swift vs React Native – two technologies that are popular for building native iOS applications. But before we get into it, here’s a question developers often face.
Can you use both React Native and Swift for building iOS native apps?
Both technologies have the potential to perform efficiently on the iOS platform. However, there are many factors to determine what language you should prefer while creating an app. Therefore, we have listed both technologies’ pros and cons to help you decide the most appropriate one for your project.
Let’s take a deep dive into the comparison pool to understand what is there to learn about both these technologies.
What is React Native? – An overview
What is Swift? – An overview
Swift is a robust multi-paradigm programming language for building applications for iOS, Mac, Apple Watch, Apple TV, and Linux OS. Apple released this intuitive and interactive language in 2014. The tech giant has made it open source. Swift is easy to read, write and maintain with simple human-friendly syntax. Additionally, it interoperates with objective C and Apple’s Cocoa and Cocoa Touch frameworks. The modern software design approach makes it an efficient, expressive, and reliable general-purpose language to develop complex applications with lightning-fast performance.
Market usage statistics
Here are some cool stats for the market usage of React Native:
- In 2021, 38% of developers are reported to use RN for cross-platform application development.
- 11.5% of developers prefer to use React Native for its native tools and libraries.
- 58.5% of the developing community loves using React Native.
Here are some cool stats for the market usage of Swift:
- According to the Stack Overflow Annual survey report of 2020, 59.5% of developers loved Swift.
- It is ranked 14th in the Tiobe index May 2022 report.
- As per the PYPL report, this app development technology ranks 10th with a market share of 1.91 %.
- It enjoys 9.6K forks and 59.5K stars on GitHub.
Use Cases– React Native vs Swift
Use cases of React Native
- Simple cross-platform apps
- Quick prototype applications
- Apps with simplified UI
- Apps that look nearly native with responsive UX using FlexBox
- Apps with reusable components
- Apps that operate with synchronous APIs
Use cases of Swift
A Study on React Native Performance Issues, and Insights on improving it
Popular Applications– React Native vs Swift
What popular apps are made with React Native?
Facebook – Developed a supercharged, supportive mobile UI with simple navigation.
Walmart – Improved user experience by building smooth in-app animations identical to native functionality.
Bloomberg – Streamlined simple-to-access, personalized content for users with automatic code refreshing features.
Instagram – Implemented push notification in the form of WebView without building navigation infrastructure.
SoundCloud – Bridged the time gap between updates and patched versions simultaneously for iOS and Android.
Wix – Achieved high speed and agility in the development of configurable navigations and screen options.
What popular apps are made with Swift?
SlideShare: This app by Linkedin has used Swift to utilize its function programming, expressive syntax, and safety features to offer excellent runtime performance and eliminate the entire class of crashes in the app.
Airbnb: The popular travel agency app has written all its new features in Swift and best utilized the SwiftLint, SwiftFormat, and Objective-C interoperability features.
Twitter: This social networking platform has best utilized the agility of Swift in its iOS app to offer fast and smooth user experience.
American Airlines: The Airline company adopted Swift for its easy-to-maintain and higher quality code to make the platform robust.
Lyft: The app-based taxi booking company leverages Swift to make the app more responsive, compact, lighter, and easier to maintain.
Test Center: Duolingo has used Swift for its Test Center app to achieve stability with fewer crashes.
Pros and Cons– React Native vs Swift
Pros of React Native
- Native rendering: Uses host platform to natively render APIs without the need for HTML or CSS markup.
- Performance: Translates the markup of an application to mimic authentic UI elements and yet maintain high performance.
- Ecosystem: Leverages rich ecosystem and UI libraries to automatically re-render app appearance with each state change.
- Debugging: Provides accessibility to intelligent debugging tools and error reporting.
- Hot-reloading: Allows hot reloading to add new codes directly into a live application.
Cons of React Native
- User Interface: Native rendering of APIs may not support certain native UI elements, which may make the UI look a little off.
- Tools and Plugins: Third-party libraries that can be used for better implementation may often turn out to be outdated.
- Performance: Does not support parallel threading and multi-processing, resulting in slow performance.
- Debugging: Chrome debugger might be inconvenient to edit, inspect codes, and UI elements properly.
Pros of Swift
- Easy to read and maintain: It has clean syntax and has fewer code lines, which are less prone to mistakes and easy to read, write, modify, and maintain.
- Cross-Platform Support: Enables cross-platform support like Linux OS and will soon be going to support Windows as well. Apart from this, Swift modules and libraries can be accessed by other supported platforms as well.
- Safety: It has a structured and strong typing system with error handling capabilities. Thus, bugs are easy to find and can be reduced to a possible extent.
- Memory: Supports dynamic libraries that reduce the memory footprint and resolves the issue of memory clogging.
- Playground Feature: Incorporates a playground by using modules for your UI code, which allow users to interact with apps while running side by side.
- Native rendering: Uses several libraries and toolkits to render native codes and APIs with the help of Xcode.
Cons of Swift
- New and small community: It’s a new open source language; hence very few developers are currently using it, and the community is in a growing phase.
- Debugging: It uses LLDB services and functions, which are sometimes clunky while debugging compiler errors. However, there are Xcode’s debugging tools available to provide the functionality required for debugging situations.
- Lack of Hot-reloading: It’s impossible with Swift; that is why it takes time while code changes occur. However, you can use injection for Xcode plugins to see the code changes in real-time, without waiting for Xcode to compile, but it is a long process.
React Native vs Swift— Performance Comparison
How does React Native stand out in terms of performance?
However, the good news is that the performance of a React Native application can be improved by doing some workarounds and using third-party libraries like Proguard that further optimizes bytecodes. Also, elements like Slowlog help setting performance timers that can help to track performance issues and to resolve them.
How does Swift stand out in terms of performance?
Swift is capable of running complex app logics and heavy computations incredibly fast. The LLVM compiler converts Swift code into optimized native code, which gives direct access to device hardware and API. Moreover, the simple syntax and standard library support help improve the overall performance across all Apple devices and app servers. API stability is another exciting feature that helps optimize performance. According to Apple, apps built in Swift are almost 2.6x faster than apps developed in Objective C.
Also you can compare two of the widely used frameworks to build mobile apps: React Native vs Flutter.
React Native and Swift- Application Architecture
What kind of architecture does React Native support?
What kind of architecture does Swift support?
MVVM, MV, Clean, and Viper are a few architectures used for apps built in Swift. Clean architecture has Xcode templates that generate components. These template components can be modified as per future requirements. Unlike MVC, it contains coding, which makes it easy to write and maintain. Viper is used along with SwiftUI that separates functions, which are easy to test and maintain and helps in developing the app faster.
Suitability for building complex apps – React Native vs Swift
Is React Native suitable for building complex apps?
Is Swift suitable for building complex apps?
Swift is one of the best choices if you wish to add native features or some other complex integrations are required. This programming language performs well for apps with complex infrastructure that requires native iOS features. In addition, Swift is capable of developing apps having complex user interfaces. So whether you need a media player app or a resource-intensive app with multiple user interfaces- Swift is the best pick, ensuring safety and performance.
Ease of Testing – React Native vs Swift
How easier is it to test a React Native app?
React Native boasts of no official support for UI level testing and Integration testing. Furthermore, there are only a few unit level testing frameworks available to test RN apps. No official support means developers have to rely on third-party tools like Appium and Detox and unearth bugs with the help of them.
Moreover, It is still relying on third-party libraries for build and release automation. Succinctly put, the entire framework doesn’t offer any automated steps to deploy the iOS apps to App Store. Instead, RN suggests developers define the manual process of deploying the app through Xcode.
How easier is it to test a Swift app?
Swift uses Xcode to test iOS apps, which supports Unit and UI testing. For the Unit test, Xcode first launches the app and then performs tests. If any bug is found, it is reported back, and then it moves to the next test case using XCTest.
UI tests, on the other side, record how a user interacts with the app. It runs the same way as Unit test does, but it uses XCUITest to implement a user interface test that ensures the whole app is working the way you require. For instance, you can use a UI test to check the onboarding flow of your app. Xcode allows test script generation and records all user interactions being recorded at the time of testing.
Community around React Native and Swift
How big is the community around React Native?
Since the launch of React Native in 2015, its community has been growing, and the number of contributors to the framework on GitHub is the proof of that. Currently, there are more than 2,207+ professional developers who actively share their experiences. Even a novice can easily seek help in developing React Native applications. In fact, there are over 19.8k live projects where developers come together to resolve existing issues. Some of the common platforms where you can find other React Native developers, projects, conferences, and live events are:
- Meet Up
- Stack Overflow
How big is the community around Swift?
Swift is just seven years old, and hence the community is not so vast at the moment. But, it is growing remarkably fast. According to several surveys and reports, significant growth in the developers’ and contributors’ count has been noticed for Swift programming language. More than 250K posts have been shared on the Swift.org forum for about 28.0K topics till date. Github alone has approximately 3,178 users who are indeed sharing their coding experience in Swift. Moreover, over 312,476 questions have been asked on Stackoverflow about this not-so-old coding language.
Modularity support for React Native and Swift
Does React Native support modularity?
React Native may offer less modularity support. Android, iOS, and Reactjs developers might find it hard to correlate with each other. Without expertise, different teams may have issues with code fragmentation in React Native. However, React Native offers the possibility to combine simple native elements of different OS platforms for different developers to work together to some extent.
Does Swift support modularity?
Yes, Swift supports modularity to ensure the scalability and flexibility of applications. It is a single unit of code distribution of an application that can communicate with other modules. This modular approach leads to clean coding. Hence maintaining and reusing the code has become easy. Modularization also speeds up the build time by reducing the amount of code compilation. Additionally, it can encapsulate a specific module to control the access.
React Native or Swift when it comes to iOS application development?
React Native and Swift- User Experience
React Native’s ability to give the best user experience
Android’s Material Design and Style Design in iOS are transforming by the day, and it’s tough for React Native to keep up with the constant change in the requirements of native platforms. Additionally, ready-made React Native UI kits such as React Virgin, Shoutem, and Ant Design make it even more difficult to create consistent designs across platforms. However, some valuable components like ScrollView fixed header, Modal components, Activity indicators, Snap carousels, and Pagination components help greatly in improving the UX across multi-platform.
Swift’s ability to give the best user experience
Swift, being a native iOS language, is meant to create a good user experience. Native tools and APIs can easily be integrated into a Swift app to deliver a seamless experience. It can also offer smooth in-app navigation. Apple also released SwiftUI back in 2019 to create better user interfaces for Swift apps quickly. Using this framework, UI created for one device can be translated to all platforms by writing a few lines of code, which helps deliver a uniform user experience. In addition, it supports dynamic type, dark Mode, localizations for common items, widgets, etc. These features can be integrated easily by writing declarative Swift syntax.
Code Maintainability – React Native vs Swift
How convenient is it to maintain code in React Native apps?
In React Native, upgrading and debugging the code is a pain, perhaps. When you fork the code to suit your application, it interferes with the framework’s logic thereby slowing down the development process. In addition to that, most of the native components might have a third-party library dependency. Often these libraries are outdated and cannot be maintained properly due to the issues that come along with it by default.
How convenient is it to maintain code in Swift apps?
Swift is a statically-typed language and has a lightweight and expressive syntax. Apart from this, it has type inference that adds clarity to the code without unnecessary clutter. All these features make it easy to read and maintain. On the other hand, developers are required to write a few lines of code to perform a specific task and need to use Xcode for tracking errors during the development process. As a result, developers can focus more on the app logic and maintain the app’s complex part more concisely and efficiently.
React Native vs Swift- Application Size
What is the minimum application size in React Native?
The initial size of the Hello World app with React Native is 7 MB and when native dependencies were added, the size increased up to 13.4 MB. React Native can iterate applications faster and at a minimal size, better than Flutter.
In addition to that, enabling Proguard and using enableSeperateBuildPerCPUArchitecture element will reduce the size in large by auto-generating split builds for all native and external libraries.
What is the minimum application size in Swift?
Swift has become a binary compatible language after releasing the version 5 update back in 2019. This compatibility introduced a significant reduction in the app size with faster launch time. Moreover, stable ABI has made incorporating Swift libraries into every iOS platform possible. As a result, apps in Swift have become smaller in size. For instance, the build size of the Hello World app in Swift is 6.7MB.
Generating specialized metadata records at compile time in standard library helps in reducing memory usage, maintaining fast performance. However, prebuilt metadata records might increase the binary code size that can be reduced by using Bitcode, App thinning, optimizing downloading and installation size, etc.
React Native vs Swift – Learning Curve
How good is the learning curve of React Native for developers?
How good is the learning curve of Swift for developers?
What’s so great about Swift is that it is a modern coding language with community support. The learning curve for this cutting-edge programming language is up to par. In fact, Apple’s app development curriculum is also offering courses to help people understand the fundamentals of Swift and how to code in this modern language. In addition, it’s an open source, so developers can refer Stack Overflow, GitHub, or Swift forums if stuck in the middle while developing their first Swift app or learning the core concepts.
One more feature, named Swift Playgrounds, is available to make the learning curve more smooth for entry-level developers and students. Using this feature, people with no coding knowledge can learn the language and experiment on native iOS apps. A survey conducted by Andrew Madson also shows that 42% of the total 110 apps on the app store were using Swift on January 15, 2019. Overall, Swift is thriving with its versatility and efficacy.
React Native and Swift – Hiring Developers
How convenient is it to hire React Native developers?
The average yearly rate of hiring good React Native developers in Western Europe is $78,000. In the USA, the average hourly rate of hiring a React Native Developer goes up to $61.54 per hour. To build an application with React Native, you’ll need about 5 to 10 developers. This team can be a mix of talent with at least 2 React Native experts to guide the team through the development lifecycle. Additionally, since code maintenance of different platforms is crucial for the success of a React Native application, it’s recommended that you team up with developers who have a diverse technical background.
How convenient is it to hire Swift developers?
Swift is proliferating and is being adopted by the majority of developers. However, developers’ level of experience plays a vital role in deciding the cost of hiring a developer. On average, hiring an iOS developer with good experience will cost you between USD 108K to USD 120K per year. The hourly rate of an iOS developer across the world apparently ranges between USD 81 to USD120. In the US alone, hourly rates for Swift developers varies between $80-350, while in Western Europe and Eastern Europe, it ranges between $60-250 and $30-120, respectively. However, the actual cost may fluctuate according to the outsourcing location, project type, and app requirement.
Does React Native replace Swift?
React Native and Swift both have been created to offer an excellent user experience on native platforms. Both have their advantages and disadvantages. However, it is challenging to decide the winner for native iOS application development.
Let’s look at the quick checklist and decide React Native or Swift- what programming language are you going to pick for your project?
Choose Swift if you wish to:
- Build apps with complex user interfaces and high memory management
- Create apps for a single platform, i.e., Apple ecosystem.
- Develop apps that need native features and APIs of iOS
- Build apps that will require maintenance upgrades in future
- Develop banking applications that need a high level of memory management and safety
Choose React Native if you wish to:
- Develop an application that you might need to share on Android.
- Develop a cost-effective application.
- Build an app that requires hot reloading and live reloading.
- Create applications that need fast development.
- Build a cross-platform application.
Inexture Solutions LLP
Swift fan boy post... React native is going under re architecture and actually tests shown it has incredible performance.
what does ABI mean?
Hi I read your blog and found it very helpful, thanks for sharing.